This is a piece that will appear in the Sunday edition of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, written by Michael Dylan Brennan, an attorney in private practice here in Cleveland and a former judicial staff attorney to the Honorable Kathleen Sutula. The column essentially sums up everything that we have been trying to get across to voters and is presented in its entirety below:
What Judge Bridget McCafferty costs us all: Michael Dylan Brennan
Published: Sunday, October 31, 2010, 3:00 AM
Plain Dealer guest columnist
By Michael Dylan Brennan
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Bridget McCafferty is disqualified from the bench but is still accepting an annual salary of $121,350. This Tuesday, she is asking for your vote to re-elect her so that she can keep collecting that salary.
Bridget McCafferty’s and Jimmy Dimora’s trial is not scheduled to begin until Sept. 12, 2011. They and several others were arrested on Sept. 15, 2010. By not resigning and dropping out of the race, she is asking for a year or more of her salary while disqualified to serve.
In addition to the annual $121,350 the taxpayers are paying for a judge who cannot hear cases, we are also paying $400 per day to a retired judge to hear the cases on her docket while the charges remain pending. By Sept. 12 of next year, assuming five days a week of service, this would exceed another $100,000 of taxpayer money.
But this is not just about the money. There is a larger principle at stake: public confidence in the judiciary.
Judges are subject to the highest standard of ethical conduct. Rule 1.2 of The Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct states that, “A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.”
The Code of Judicial Conduct does not set forth specific examples nor mandate a judge’s resignation. However, the official comments with the rules observe that “[th]e test for appearance of impropriety is an objective standard that focuses on whether the conduct would create, in reasonable minds, a perception that the judge violated this code, engaged in conduct that is prejudicial to public confidence in the judiciary, or engaged in other conduct that reflects adversely on the judge’s honesty, impartiality, temperament or fitness to serve as a judge.”
When Cuyahoga Common Pleas Judge Michael Gallagher was arrested back in 1995 on drug-related charges, he refused to resign as well. He collected his salary for seven more months while disqualified from the bench. After his conviction, he was disbarred. Ohio Supreme Court Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, in her concurring opinion, wrote:
“[A]lthough the law did not require the respondent to resign from office upon his arrest, and he retained a presumption of innocence, respondent knew [his conduct]. He had a moral obligation to resign from his position. Yet he continued to draw his judicial salary, funded by taxpayer monies, from Aug. 3, 1995 until March 4, 1996. This created an appearance of impropriety and seriously damaged the public image of the judiciary.”
Even with the presumption of innocence, can Judge McCafferty read Rule 1.2 and its comments and fairly maintain that she is promoting public confidence in the judiciary and avoiding even an appearance of impropriety as she holds on to the bench and draws her salary while disqualified from acting as a judge due to her indictment in the county corruption probe? And further, ask the electorate to re-elect her under these circumstances? I don’t think so. Apparently, she thinks otherwise. And in this unique instance, you — the voters of Cuyahoga County — can weigh in as well.
We are fortunate that McCafferty is not running unopposed. Her opponent, Michael Astrab, is qualified and ready to take the bench. Astrab’s ratings on judge4yourself.com were higher than the incumbent’s even before her indictment. As such, Astrab stood to be the better choice regardless. In light of her indictment, his election should go a long way toward restoring the public trust in the local judiciary. He is also the more economical choice. Elect Michael Astrab, and pay for one judge, not two, to do the work of one.
Like all criminal defendants, McCafferty is entitled to a presumption of innocence before trial. She is not entitled to keep collecting her salary while she prepares her legal defense if we vote to replace her this election.
Do not be fooled by the name game: This year, it will cost twice as much money in salaries and an immeasurable sum in eroding public confidence in the judiciary.
Brennan is an attorney based in Mayfield Heights and a former judicial staff attorney for the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas.
© 2010 cleveland.com. All rights reserved.